Live now — Call the Advocate +91 89585 00365

Home / Legal Guides / Cheque bounce cases under Section 138

Criminal defence & civil recovery

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138

A dishonoured cheque is one of the few situations where the law runs on a strict clock. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 creates an offence — but only if a sequence of steps is completed within defined periods. Miss one, and the complaint fails no matter how genuine the debt.

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 — Advocate Pravesh Prasad Joshi, Dehradun

Written by Dehradun, Uttarakhand Last reviewed August 2026

The timeline, step by step

These periods are the whole architecture of the section. They are worth writing down:

  • The cheque must be presented to the bank within its validity period, ordinarily three months.
  • On dishonour, the bank issues a return memo — keep the original, it is the foundation of the case.
  • A written demand notice must be sent to the drawer within 30 days of receiving information of dishonour.
  • The drawer then has 15 days from receipt of the notice to make payment.
  • If payment is not made, a complaint must be filed within one month of the expiry of those 15 days.

What the cheque must have been for

The section applies where the cheque was issued for the discharge, in whole or in part, of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. A cheque given as a gift, as security in some circumstances, or for a debt that has become time-barred, may not attract the section. Once the signature is admitted, the law presumes the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt — and it falls to the accused to raise a probable defence to the contrary.

Where the complaint is filed

A complaint is ordinarily filed before the court within whose jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee maintains the account is situated. For a payee banking in Dehradun, that usually means the Judicial Magistrate at Dehradun.

If you are the accused

Receiving a Section 138 notice is not the moment to go quiet. A reply within the 15-day window — accurate, and drafted with care — often shapes everything that follows. Genuine defences do exist: that the notice was defective or out of time, that no legally enforceable debt existed, that the cheque was misused, or that the amount was in fact paid.

What rarely helps is ignoring the notice and hoping the matter disappears. It does not.

Weighing it up

Every remedy costs something as well as giving something. Both sides, plainly.

What it gives you

  • The pressure is realA criminal complaint concentrates the mind in a way a civil suit does not. A large share of Section 138 matters settle precisely because the accused wants it to stop.
  • The presumption favours youOnce the signature is admitted, the law presumes the cheque was for a legally enforceable debt. The burden shifts to the accused. Few civil remedies hand you that.
  • It is a documentary caseThe cheque, the return memo, the notice and the postal receipt do most of the work. Compared with an ordinary civil trial, there is little to prove.
  • Interim compensation is availableThe court may direct the accused to pay a portion of the cheque amount during the case, rather than making you wait for the end.

What it costs you

  • The clock is unforgivingThirty days for the notice, fifteen for payment, one month to file. Miss any of them and a completely genuine claim dies on a technicality — this is the single largest source of failed complaints.
  • A conviction is not paymentPeople assume conviction means recovery. It does not. The compensation must still be executed, and if the accused has nothing, you have a judgment and no money.
  • It is slow despite being "summary"These matters routinely run for years. The label is summary; the experience is not.
  • You must attendComplainant evidence means appearing, being sworn, and being cross-examined. For an outstation complainant this is a recurring cost in time and travel.
  • It can be met with a counter-narrativeThe common defence — that the cheque was given as security, or blank, or was stolen — is easy to plead and expensive to disprove where nothing was written down.

What it looks like in practice

The part that is rarely written down — what the days, the queues and the waiting actually feel like.

The paper trail decides it

Everything turns on four documents most people treat casually: the cheque, the bank return memo, the notice, and the postal receipt with the acknowledgement. Keep the originals. Photocopies of a return memo have sunk more Section 138 cases than any clever defence.

If the notice comes back "unclaimed" or "refused", do not open the envelope. Refusal is generally treated as service, and that sealed envelope is your proof. Opening it out of curiosity destroys the evidentiary value of the very thing that proves service.

Send the notice by registered post with acknowledgement due, to the address in the records. Sending only by email or WhatsApp, however modern, invites an argument about service that you do not need.

What the case looks like from the inside

The first stage is your own evidence on affidavit and the accused being summoned. Summons are often not served — wrong address, avoidance — and months disappear here. Bailable warrants may follow. This stage frustrates complainants more than any other, because nothing appears to be happening and the fault lies with a process you cannot control.

Mediation will be suggested, and it is worth taking seriously. A negotiated payment received this year is usually worth more than a decree three years from now against a person who has arranged to own nothing.

If you are the accused: the reply to the notice is the cheapest and most valuable step in the whole matter. A considered reply within fifteen days, putting your version on record before positions harden, is worth more than any argument made two years later.

Mistakes that recur

The same avoidable errors arrive in chamber after chamber. Most cost far more than any fee.

  1. Presenting the cheque again after the notice period has already been triggered, in the belief that it resets everything.
  2. Sending the notice on the 32nd day. The period runs from receipt of information of dishonour, and it is counted strictly.
  3. Opening the returned envelope when the notice comes back refused or unclaimed.
  4. Accepting part payment without recording it in writing, then finding the amount in the complaint no longer matches the cheque.
  5. As the accused — ignoring the notice entirely, then trying to explain the silence in cross-examination.

Common questions

Is a cheque bounce a criminal or civil matter?

Section 138 creates a criminal offence, but the underlying money claim is civil. In practice both routes exist: a Section 138 complaint and, separately, a civil suit for recovery. Which to pursue — or whether to pursue both — depends on the facts and on what you want to achieve.

What if I miss the 30-day notice period?

The cause of action for that presentation is lost. In some cases the cheque can be presented again within its validity and a fresh notice issued on the fresh dishonour. Whether that is open to you depends on the dates, so advice should be taken quickly.

Can the matter be settled?

Yes. Section 138 is compoundable, and courts actively encourage settlement, including through mediation. Many cheque matters end in a negotiated payment rather than a full trial.

This guide sets out general information about the law as it applies in Dehradun, Uttarakhand. It is not legal advice, and it is no substitute for advice on your own facts. The law changes, and how it applies varies from case to case.

WhatsApp