Injunctions and stay orders
A temporary injunction under Order XXXIX CPC preserves the position while a suit is decided. Three things must be shown together, and a case failing any one of them will not get the order:
- A prima facie case — a serious question to be tried, not necessarily a winning one.
- Balance of convenience — that more harm follows from refusing the order than from granting it.
- Irreparable injury — harm that money cannot afterwards repair.
Suits for possession and declaration
Where possession has already been lost, the remedy depends on how it was lost. A suit for possession based on title asserts ownership. A suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act allows a person dispossessed otherwise than in due course of law to recover possession quickly — without even proving title — but it must be brought within six months. Where the dispute is about what the documents mean, a declaratory suit settles the position.
Adverse possession
A person in possession that is open, continuous, hostile and to the knowledge of the true owner for twelve years may defeat the owner's title. Permissive possession — a tenant, a licensee, a relative allowed to stay — never becomes adverse merely by lasting a long time; it becomes adverse only from an open denial of the owner's title. The lesson for owners is simple: silence is dangerous, and encroachment should be answered on paper as soon as it appears.
Before you buy land
Most title litigation could have been avoided in the week before the purchase:
- Trace the title back — thirty years is the conventional search.
- Inspect the revenue record; confirm the Khasra and Khatauni entries match the seller's claim.
- Obtain an encumbrance certificate and check for mortgages, charges and pending litigation.
- Visit the site and verify boundaries against the record — not against what you are told.
- Confirm land use and conversion status, and in Uttarakhand confirm any restrictions applicable to the purchase of agricultural land.